Loading editor
  • Franklin Shocked 5

    Also, I don't see any Allosaurs in this image.

      Loading editor
    • I've already added one.
      Iris Photograph

      As for the Franklin photo, I'm not what to do about it. I didn't note any Allosaurus while making the screenshot, so someone must've misplaced that photo into the Allosaurus article.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello! Please check out this post I did on CrashBash's Wall and let us know if you have any feedback. Thanks!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Including just before the T. rex smashes it.

      Loading editor
  • We need some screenshots of the majority of the characters in Fallen Kingdom (Owen Grady, Claire Dearing, Maisie Lockwood, Benjamin Lockwood, Gunnar Eversol, Franklin Webb, Zia Rodriguez, Ken Wheatley, Henry Wu, Iris Carroll some more of Eli Mills and Ian Malcolm).

    What we need is screenshots of the final parts of Benjamin Lockwood & Gunnar Eversol; the final scene of Owen, Claire & Maisie driving to an unknown location; Owen, Claire, Maisie, Franklin & Zia leaving the manor after seeing Blue leave; the characters who took part and witness the disruption of Lockwood Manor Auction, among others. There's hardly any screenshots of Iris, Wu, Eversol, Franklin and Zia. We're gonna need more of them. We also got screenshots with logos on them, including one on 2018 Dinosaur Outbreak that has the Fandango Movieclips thing on the lower left and the Owen & Claire kissing screenshot has the M on the right side of it that is on Claire Dearing. Find something to replace them without logos.

    So please, see what you can do.

      Loading editor
    • View all 10 replies
    • Mjamnnella, the picture you got is an incorrect name. It has Claire looking at the dinosaurs with Zia in the background. The name should be changed to Claire Looking at Dinosaurs or removed it to make a correct name change.

      EDIT: There are other Zia and Franklin images that seem to be more focused on Owen, Claire and such. They need to fixed with correct names.

      Claire Looking at Dinosaurs
        Loading editor
    • I'll see what I can do Edit: I finished renaming some of the images.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • To add to their pages?

      Loading editor
  • hi mjamnnella i am just wondering if you can get a image of ken Wheatley  dinosaur teeth  so that we  can  Speculat on which dinosaur teeth are from the caputred dinosaurs and also another image of  a triceratops,sinoceratops and ankylosaurus which run out of the lockwood manor after Maisie pushes the button and they are just seen after when the carnotaurus and parasaurolophus run if you can do this thanks.

      Loading editor
  • Hey, Mj, just wanted to remind you that since Halloween is over, we can change the scheme of the site to the JP logo scheme. Thanks.

      Loading editor
  • Can you help makes this card?

    44892738 10211154809220750 2278024471677763584 n
      Loading editor
  • Mjamnnella, I have finally finished the new law system. I have decided to do this: first go from Crypman8 then to Owerslachlan, and all the way up to CrashBash, and othr higher-rankers, and present the prop to them. I want to know what you think. If you agree, here you go:

    This is what you need to do: 1. Read it. 2. Find things you want to change, and edit it, then post it on this discussion. 3. Sign it, before you post it. Here is the law: New law proposal of 2018

    Also known as "the stable system act".

    Under this new law system, the way moderators keep the wiki in check, will now partially involve the public itself. Proposed by Crypman8, the already active "Vote of no confidence", will play a crucial role in this system. This allows other users to vote for themselves, what fate a prosecuted user has. Under this system, users will play the main part in the trial of other users.

    What stays and changes

    Moderation will no longer be fully, deletion, and warning. However, this of course does stay as a part of the act. Small Mod actions, such as editing posts, breaking up fights, and closing threads, will still be a part, of course. The moderators will retain all their rights, and the non moderators will gain a responsibility for the protection of the site, at a certain point, as the before stated, Vote of no confidence".


    This has been made directly for the protection of the site, and especially the the moderators. On the 22nd of October two more moderators will be added(who's names are not disclosed. However, some may know who they are). With this happening, the law will now let other moderators train and Apprentice other users, who wish to become mods themselves, not, just the head moderator, Carnotaur. Along with this, a new ranking system will be made:


    Bureaucrats-who have the right to ban, to do system control, and have complete control of the site.

    Admins-who have the rights to ban, and scan the site for vandalization, and to help other users.


    Content moderators-who have the right to ban, stop vandalization, and out right keep the pages, and message walls safe.

    Head discussion moderators-who have the right to report, delete, lock threads, delete threads, and edit threads, in the discussion posts, and every other discussion on message walls, blogs, and page discussions, on the entire site itself.

    Regular discussion moderators-who have the all the same rights as the head Moderator. However, it is advised that a serious situation be reported by them, to the head moderator.

    Chat moderators-who have the rights to protect the chat, by banning users from chat, and kicking them out if necessary.

    Moderator trainees- Who have the rights to report, and to patrol the site for problems.

    Users-who have the rights to report, and do what they can to stop situations. They also have the right to hold, and to participate in a "Vote of no confidence".

    This is the proposed ranking. With this, we can have easier time keeping the wiki safe. However, all users are still equal in every way, except ranking.

    The laws

    The laws are based off of three things: Infraction, misdemeanor, and felony. The idea is simple: If some makes a slight error, its a infraction. If they make a error that is a larger problem for the site, they get a misdemeanor. Finally, if they make a mistake that is a threat to the sites calm, and in order system, they get a felony, and a "Vote of no confidence".

    Felonies: Vandalizing page(s) once: warning, and fix.

    Vandalizing page(s) multiple: "Vote of no confidence".

    Spamming once: warning and possibly deletion.

    Spamming multiple: deletion, and "Vote of no confidence".

    Bullying and harassing: warning, and "Vote of no confidence", depending on. Severity.


    Problem starting multiple: "Vote of no confidence".

    Inserting inappropriate content unsuitable for younger users, such a derogatory statements once: warning, and deletion.

    Inserting inappropriate content unsuitable for younger users, such a derogatory statements multiple: "Vote of no confidence".

    Use of foul language in a insulting way once: warning, and deletion.

    Use of foul language in a insulting way multiple: "Vote of no confidence".


    Double, triple, or more posting once: possible deletion, warning.

    Double, triple posting multiple: deletion, and "Vote of no confidence".

    Lying, and telling false truths once: warning and instant deletion.

    Lying, and telling false truths multiple: "Vote of no confidence".

    With this list, we can quickly round up a problem.

    NOTE: the use of "once" and "multiple" represent the first time a user commits the crime, and any number they commit afterward. If it is FULLY necessary to block someone without a vote, a user is allowed that, of course. This law is mostly focused on discussion, chat, blog, and message wall oriented.

    Note by original writer: hopefully this can help you decide, but I have taken a class on law and order, and believe this prop. to be very important to to wikia.


    Finally,this would repeal the second guidline, which states that a user can not ask for upvotes.





      Loading editor
    • View all 6 replies
    • I'd just lump that under insults. I'll go and sign it now.

        Loading editor
    • Thanks Mjamnnella, this process is going quick, soon Ill give it CrashBash.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message